 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v8cel-0000Q9C; Wed, 2 Oct 96 20:32 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 03 Oct 1996 09:44:47 -0700 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"bEjrs1.0.jR4.6VnKo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Oct 3 10: |
11:10 1996 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| X-Mailer: |
Mozilla 2.01KIT (Win16; I) |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What could be the cause for low copper peel strength. A strong transfer
is observed. (i.e deposits of copper on the substrate is observed). But
even then the peel strength is low.
Any information on this will be appreciated.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
