Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v8XFD-0000TUC; Wed, 2 Oct 96 14:46 CDT |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Oct 1996 15:54:08 +0400 (EDT) |
From [log in to unmask] Wed Oct 2 15: |
39:30 1996 |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"0GJ9d2.0.qCJ.2QiKo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks to all who responded to my request for information on this
subject. I spoke on the phone with Dale Wilheit at IBM Austin, who added
something that may be of interest. In his operation, he uses the
technique of "pre-control", which I believe was proposed by Dorian
Shainin. At the end of every shift (3 per day) the operator takes a
reading with a UV power meter and plots it on a pre-control chart. The
pre-control technique is a very simple imitation of SPC. Dale said he
has a lot of turnover, so doesn't want to spend time training operators
in SPC. Pre-control is quick and easy, and would seem to give him a
substantial portion of the information and guidance that true SPC would.
Lou Hart
.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|