TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0v8EVj-00005OC; Tue, 1 Oct 96 18:45 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 1 Oct 1996 19:54:27 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Oct 2 08:
51:55 1996
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/6617
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"AgdtV2.0.vzG.rqQKo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Jim,

More info is needed.  Is there any cracked copper after solder shock in the
holes?  This is the highest stress point for plated copper, far higher than
any surface stress point.

Are the surface cracks present before LPI application?

Could these cracks possibly be plating folds?  This could be a low current
density area which is susceptible to folded plating.  Some plating folds look
exactly like cracks, though I have seen this mostly within the PTH.

Dave Sullivan ([log in to unmask])

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2