 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 26 Sep 1996 16:35:45 -0500 |
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Sep 26 16: |
39:34 1996 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"8QpD-2.0.eVK.NLlIo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v6NyK-0000SCC; Thu, 26 Sep 96 16:27 CDT |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32) |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Recently a question came up as to the "nominal" defect rates which prevail
during assembly of pwb's using pth technology. Can anyone advise what the
average ppm rates are running for such assembly operations. By "average" I
mean jobs which are neither "crashing" nor one-of-a-kind (golden samples)
but numbers which reflect the comfort level for an in-control manufacturing
process. Reply to [log in to unmask] Thanks in advance, Jim Moffitt
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
