 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v6GTE-00005BC; Thu, 26 Sep 96 08:27 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Sep 26 14: |
02:21 1996 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 1996 22:27:06 +0800 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Cc: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Priority: |
3 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"LklPh.0.W_7.pIeIo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-MSMail-Priority: |
Normal |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Are you really able to achieve 1.5 micron dynamic runout ? Are yours new
drilling machines? I am asking this because some info I have from two
companies said they are controlling at 10 and 15 micron (dynamic runout)
respectively. Maybe you can share some tips on how you can manage to
achieve such a low runout. I would appreciate that.
To other technet users in the drilling section, is 1.5 micron dynamic
runout the norm in your control of dynamic runout?
Regards
----------
> From: [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Drilling spindle runout
> Date: Wednesday, September 25, 1996 1:05 AM
>
> We are controlling to less than 1.5 microns, dynamically at 80K rpm.
>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: Drilling spindle runout
> Author: [log in to unmask] at INTERNET
> Date: 09/24/96 9:23
>
>
> I would like to know for the drilling machines used in the manufacturing
of
> pcb's, what is the dynamic runout (in micron) that you(for those involve)
> are controlling. Replies are very much appreciated. Thanks
>
> Regards
>
>
|
|
|
