 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Sep 18 08: |
54:48 1996 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<TechNet-d-request> |
| Date: |
Tue, 17 SEP 96 16:53:54 MDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Cc: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"4-am21.0.pq5.FfoFo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v38ue-0000PiC; Tue, 17 Sep 96 17:46 CDT |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Much depends on the PCB surface coating. If you use PCB's that are coated
with tin/lead in a hot aired solder leveling process, the stencil will not
mate flush with the PCB, and your readings might be a little higher.
If you are using an organic solder preservative, you should be getting a
good mate, and thus print near your stencil thickness depending a bit on
some of the settings on the screen printer.
Electroplated PCB's will also provide a near 1:1 deposit as well.
Steve A
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
