 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v33Ip-0000RWC; Tue, 17 Sep 96 11:47 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 17 Sep 1996 12:43:32 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Original-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Sep 17 13: |
57:52 1996 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"8AMPy2.0.h_H.HOjFo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<DesignerCouncil-request> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
<199609171643.MAA03809@electron> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Don,
The Anti-pad size rule I've been using is
((FHS + .030))
I round up to the nearest convenient aperature size..
i.e. .038 FHS would get a .070 antipad.
Of course this will not always work with some of those wacko
crazy miniature audio jacks with large lead diameter pins on
.050 centers, but it's good for 90% of TH comps.
Tom Kavendek
Lucent Technologies
Murray Hill, N.J.
****************************************************************************
* The mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
****************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
****************************************************************************
|
|
|
