 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v2lqQ-0000PoC; Mon, 16 Sep 96 17:08 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 96 18:16:44 -0300 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Sep 17 08: |
34:35 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"dy6Zk3.0.NnF.j_SFo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have just recently implemented the Picard Exposure Frames. This system has been performing very well registration and exposure wise, however; our quality system for first piece inspection has opened some production concerns.
Could anyone tell me what quality systems they are using and what system was found that did not hurt their production.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
