 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v2gek-00005BC; Mon, 16 Sep 96 11:36 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 1996 09:44:45 -0700 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| Priority: |
Normal |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"B81EJ1.0.b_L.58OFo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Sep 16 13: |
09:23 1996 |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Read-Receipt-To: |
|
| From: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Does anyone have any experience with .250-.275" thick lamination caul plates versus .375" thick? Is
the extra cost of the thicker caul plates worth it? Please respond with the pros and cons based on your
experience with them.
Fred J. Paul, Sr. Process Engineer
PCB Operations, FLUKE CORPORATION
direct: 206 356-5734 fax: 206 356-6070
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
