Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v1m7s-0000RdC; Fri, 13 Sep 96 23:14 CDT |
Lines: |
17 |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Sep 1996 09:53:14 GMT |
Precedence: |
list |
Reply-To: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-User: |
Alpha Test Version Of FI-Mail, DisWin 1.5C:\WINSOCK\WINDIS |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Rgn9r1.0.GWD.l4ZEo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Mon Sep 16 09: |
21:25 1996 |
X-Mailer: |
FIMail V0.9d |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In your message dated Thursday 12, September 1996 you wrote :
> Does anyone have info regarding successful techniques for retaining
> unclinched parts in an assembly through the wave solder process?
> We'd like to continue with our parts "prepped" to the correct lead length,
> but we're open to suggestion.
If you are placing components manually after pre-cutting leads to length you
might consider a more complex machine which forms the leads to retain them in
the hole. This works well for both radial and axial components and they do not
move during flow soldering.
--
Paul Gould
Teknacron Circuits Ltd
EMail [log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|