Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Sep 1996 08:23:24 -0400 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
X-Sender: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"uwv7F.0.t4D.F6dDo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0v0kDY-0000LcC; Wed, 11 Sep 96 03:00 CDT |
From [log in to unmask] Fri Sep 13 09: |
33:48 1996 |
X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16) |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Why can't these things be returned to the manufacturer for re-use rather
than recycling them?
>You bring up some interesting environmental questions. We also used to toss
>out a huge amount of these trays, but have now found a recycler that would
>pick them up at no charge. It would seem prudent to recycle even at a break
>even cost, since most of these trays are manufactured with a thermoset
>plastic due to the heat requirements for baking the components within the
>trays. Simply meaning the trays cannot be melted down, but must rather be
>ground into small pieces and mixed in with other plastic to be reformed.
>The strength of the recycled thermoset plastics is not comparable to that
>of the original. Somewhat like comparing pressed board to a tree!
>I have heard the grinding process beats up the grinding equipment, which
>makes the profit of recycling this material very low.
>
>This is just my understanding, do we have any real experts out there?
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|