TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uz6aO-0000RNC; Fri, 6 Sep 96 14:29 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 6 Sep 1996 15:37:01 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/6101
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"eXWUq1.0.7D8._j7Co"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Sep 13 08:
46:02 1996
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I'm looking for some input from board fabricators.

1. Does anyone cross section after electroless as a routine? If so, how
often?

2. How frequently do you cross section after pattern plate? Do you use
coupons or actual parts? If you use both, what is the ratio, coupons/actual
parts? What is the frequency? How much do you rely on nondestructive testing?

Thanks in advance for your input.

David Pizzoferrato
QA Manager
Centerline Circuits

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2