Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uvTuN-0000NJC; Tue, 27 Aug 96 14:34 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
27 Aug 1996 15:34:50 -0400 |
From [log in to unmask] Tue Aug 27 14: |
40:32 1996 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Cc: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Q3T2P1.0.2lC.Gtq8o"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Mailer: |
Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2 |
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Paragraph 3.4.1.2.2 of MIL P 55110E allows the use of foil lamination when the
pregreg is purchased to 13949 and the foil is purchased to IPC-MF-150.
Paragraph 3.6.4.8 (as invoked by Group B Testing; Table 8) requires that the
foil lamination process is subjected to the peel strength test described in
4.8.4.8 as part of the group B monthly routine only when product with foil
lamination has surface conductors or surface mounts lands (test not
applicable if no foil lamination or only foil lamination on
pads-only-outer-later. The testing is to be done at a lab which has
suitability status to 13949, but the board manufacturer does not certify
facility or product to 13949.
Lisa Greenleaf
Teradyne Connection Systems
603-791-3118
--------------------------------------
Date: 8/27/96 3:29 PM
To: LISA GREENLEAF
From: [log in to unmask]
I believe this changed quite sometime back. You could submit foil lam
provided you met peel strength values. I even had my Group B done
along with this peel strength test.
Someone from one of the independent labs may shed some more light
on this than I can.
DHH
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Military spec interpretation
Author: [log in to unmask] at SMTPLINK-HADCO
Date: 8/27/96 1:58 PM
When producing multi layer PCBs to MIL-P-55110 we have historically used a
"cap" build.,as the
interpretation was that to use a "foil" build we would have to get approval
under MIL-P-13949,a laminate
spec.. Is this the general concensus or are people using foil builds against
the 55110 spec??
Regards
Paul Greene
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|