 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 1996 15:45:29 -0600 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Aug 22 06: |
06:19 1996 |
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
jmarcy@hp7001 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"1JjQb2.0.uiF.X3Z6o"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0usyXa-0000LBC; Tue, 20 Aug 96 16:40 CDT |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) |
| Message-Id: |
<2.2.16.19960820214529.2fe7f920@hp7001> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Our initial sampling of microvia technologies shows a difference in the
registration capabilities of products as compared to "standard technology"
FR4 boards. Our assembly testing engineers are questioning what the
smallest reliable probe-able target is they can place on the product. Will
any modifications to the standard bed of nails fisture be required? Can
anyone lend some words of wisdom?
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
