 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0urRWF-0000KoC; Fri, 16 Aug 96 11:13 CDT |
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Aug 16 16: |
16:49 1996 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 1996 11:19:57 -0600 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"cAM1r.0.LDG.Hu95o"@ipc> |
| Content-type: |
text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
| Subject: |
|
| Message-id: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
| Content-disposition: |
inline |
| X-Mailer: |
Novell GroupWise 4.1 |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
DOES ANYONE HAVE EXPERIENCE IN COMPARING INERTING THE WAVE
SOLDERING OPERATION ONLY AT THE WAVE AS OPPOSED TO FULL
TUNNEL INERTING?
CAN YOU GO TO VERY LOW SOLIDS FLUXES (0.5-1.0%) WITH
BOUNDARY INERTING OR DO YOU NEED THE FULL TUNNEL?
IF YOU CAN GET BY WITH BOUNDARY INERTING:
1. CAN YOU GAIN A BENEFIT BY BEING ABLE TO USE LESS
EXPENSIVE, LOW FORCE PROBE, TEST FIXTURES?
2. CAN YOU DECREASE THE FALSE REJECTS IN TEST WHICH ARE DUE
TO FLUX RESIDUES?
VIC BELDAVS
(414) 362-2797
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
