TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uqmLP-0000MlC; Wed, 14 Aug 96 15:15 CDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Aug 14 17:
47:16 1996
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5764
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"yneS91.0.whI.EFZ4o"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:23:04 +0400 (EDT)
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
Here are two questions that the Compunetics SPC group brought up today:

(1)  Is inner layer core material completely cured when it comes from the 
supplier?  One of our guys suggested Polyclad told him that it was not - 
that was a surprise to us, if true.

(2)  If materials differ in their effect on inner layer shifts, does that 
mean you each material type should have its own film set to make the same 
part?  

Bob Holmes and Dave Rooke mentioned a few days ago a "theoretical model" 
for film compensation.  How do I find out more about it?

Thanks again for all help.   Lou Hart


.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2