 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 1996 11:01:11 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Aug 14 14: |
21:56 1996 |
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"i_QJ83.0.843.gPV4o"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uqiFv-0000LBC; Wed, 14 Aug 96 10:53 CDT |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello everyone,
We have one SM chip on our boards which is put on by a contractor. Lately,
we are seeing excessive flux residues on and around the pads. The residues
have look of frosted crystals. The flux used is a no-clean flux.
Is it acceptable for these residues to be there? Will it create any problem
now or later? What is acceptability standard?
Thanks for your help,
Paresh Patel
Oneac Corp.
(847)816-6000 x-704.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
