Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Aug 1996 09:16:08 +0200 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
X-Sender: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
From [log in to unmask] Tue Aug 13 10: |
38:15 1996 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Lu1D21.0.2IJ.lW24o"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uqDTM-0000LcC; Tue, 13 Aug 96 02:01 CDT |
Message-Id: |
<v01520d00ae35d937f849@[129.132.54.198]> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Todd,
John
I think the adhesion of a soldermask does not only depend on the
cleanliness of the board. Mechanical scrub does roughen the surface to a
certain extend. This has several effects :
- A rough surface is bigger than a flat one giving more opportunity to the
molecules to bind to each other.
- The irregular shape of the surface provides a certain mechanical fixture
of the coating.
- If a polymer is coated mechanical scrub will break some molecule chains
on the surface. Since the open ends of the chains want to reassemble a
coating will adhere better than on a polymerized surface.
Regasds
Guenter Grossmann
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|