Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uohDd-0000LcC; Thu, 8 Aug 96 21:22 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Aug 1996 22:32:42 -0400 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Fri Aug 9 09: |
01:05 1996 |
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ouoKp2.0.49G.f3g2o"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Wayne,
The kicker is the alkaline etch. If you were using acid etch, usually, the
chromates don't bother you much. I don't feel that just a sulfuric acid will
get the job done 100% of the time. Some companies are using a acid cleaner
with a slight microetch in it to remove the chromates. My preference is to
use a alkaline cleaner with a chromate removal chemistry in it, followed by a
good water rinse and dry. There are some alkaline etch dry films on the
market that are compatible with this type of preclean.
Ken Bridges - Morton
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|