TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0unxDK-0000LUC; Tue, 6 Aug 96 20:15 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 06 Aug 96 15:42:28 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5602
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"aDOBB1.0.IzB.Tu-1o"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"ericfremd" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Wed Aug 7 08:
40:20 1996
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
     Is there an IPC void size specification for PBGA's detected by 
     transmission X-ray (we use Nicolett Systems).
     
     Our current guideline is- voids are acceptable only if they are 
     smaller than 20% of the diameter of the solder ball.  What is your 
     criteria for acceptability?
     
     Do you have reliability data to support your specification? Has there 
     been any published papers specifically on the effects of voids on the 
     reliability of PBGA solder joints?
     
     Sincerely,
     Eric Fremd
     Process Developement Engineer
     Solectron Technical Center
     (408) 956-6194
     [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2