Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uno7P-0000NDC; Tue, 6 Aug 96 10:32 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 06 Aug 96 11:40:01 EDT |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Aug 6 17: |
52:30 1996 |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Gb_Zd3.0.1m8.AMs1o"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Stephen Ayotte
EM Quality Engineering
Bldg. 14-3 Col F5 5-1537
Subject:
I have a question similar to the ionics question asked last week.
Does anybody know the impact that gold hardness and impurity has
on wirebondability?
For a gold wire wedge bonder application the specification requires
gold with a Knoop hardness of 90 or less and a purity of 99.9 or
higher. What if the hardness is greater than 90? How high has anyone
done testing; 100, 200, 300? Same for purity, how low a purity has
anyone done testing or had practical experience with; 99.5, 99.0, 98.0?
Thanks.
**** IBM MD Product Quality Engineer ****
**** OEM Quality Engineer ****
**** Interenterprise Address: USIB6CEF ****
**** Internet Address: [log in to unmask] ****
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|