 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tjFlG-00005QC; Sun, 4 Feb 96 19:30 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Sun, 4 Feb 1996 20:34:00 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 5 16: |
09:12 1996 |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Z0bx_1.0.B37.rsL5n"@ipc> |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would be interested in knowing which "ENTEK" broke down with the apparent
hot spots.
You mentioned anti-ox, this would suggest ENTEK CU-56, a monomolecular
coating which will break down at temperatures above 170F. ENTEK PLUS CU-106A
is a more robust coating which can pass through several thermal cycles.
Please clarify.
Tom Eshelman
Enthone-OMI
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
