 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Sun, 4 Feb 1996 17:28:40 -0500 (EST) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| X-Sender: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 5 16: |
08:47 1996 |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tjCmO-00005gC; Sun, 4 Feb 96 16:19 CST |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"zk88C1.0.2b5.l3J5n"@ipc> |
| X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
With respect to the response by Mr. Jerry Cupples:
Here, Here ! ... I couldn't have said it better myself.
Right on about the design effects on warpage, too bad there appears to be a
divergent trend towards non optimal designs (split planes, odd layer counts,
etc..) and even tighter levels of flatness (or is that non-warpness??)
Until we have agreed on a "unified theory of the (pwb) universe" there will
always be such occasions for thrust and parry.
[log in to unmask]
D. Rooke
([log in to unmask])
|
|
|
