TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jul 30 13:
04:51 1996
Date:
Tue, 30 Jul 1996 12:10:34 -0600
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5440
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"BQ-bd3.0.dJJ.9va_n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0ulJ86-0000LTC; Tue, 30 Jul 96 13:02 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Nancy,

Fab requirements are probably getting tighter (we spec 6.45 micrograms/in2 NaCl 
for PCBs which is/was Bellcore) because assembly outgoing requirement per 
J-STD-001A 8.3.2 is 1.56 micrograms/cm2 NaCl (or 10.06 micrograms/in2 NaCl) 
ionic residues, same as IPC-RB-276.  

Specifying a tighter cleanliness standard for PCBs gives the assemblers
a guardband.  PCB suppliers should not have a problem meeting the tighter 
cleanliness spec if the PCBs go through a final cleaning prior to packaging and 
shipping.  We've been at 6.4 for years without having any complaints from our 
suppliers, our PCBs typically come in the 2 - 4 microgram/in2 NaCl.  

My opinion of checking prior to Entek coating is that it's not necessary.  A 
cleaning and microetch is part of the standard Entek process, so any residual 
contaminants on a PCB should be cleaned off in the Entek process.  Others might 
have a different opinion.

Tracy Tennant
Micron Technology
[log in to unmask]

                                                       30-JUL-1996 09:49:48.21
>From:   [log in to unmask] 
>To:     [log in to unmask],[log in to unmask],STHUMMEL,TTENNANT,MIKEPARRY
>Subj:   Fab-Ionic Contamination
>
>Dear Technet,
>
>I have a question about the ionic contamination limits stated in
>the IPC-RB-276.
>
>Reference to IPC-RB-276 Section 3.13.3, it is specified the
>resistivity shall not be less than 10.06 micrograms/sq.inch of
>sodium chloride.
>
>I have discovered that many OEM's are requiring this to be 6
>micrograms/sg. inch.
>
>Is this left over from the Mil-Spec days?
>
>Also
>
>Should boards that are checked before Entek Application be
>required to be 6 micrograms per sq/inch as well?
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>Nancy Nelson
>Dell Computer
>[log in to unmask]
>
>***************************************************************************
>* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
>***************************************************************************
>* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
>* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
>***************************************************************************
>
>
>
>

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2