TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0ukxbN-0000LMC; Mon, 29 Jul 96 14:03 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 29 Jul 96 13:52:43 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5422
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jul 30 12:
04:53 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"DsWVV2.0.bsL.7iG_n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Vince, Harlan" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
     Hello TechNetters!
     
     Has anyone had any experience with blind vias in BGA pads?  The 
     BGA is a 225 I/O, 1.27mm" pitch.  The ball diameter is .0295" and 
     the pad size being considered is .030".  The via hole size is 
     .012" maximum.  I have had success with vias in pads that go 
     through the board but I'm concerned about using a blind via in the 
     BGA attachment pad due to outgassing or some other unknown 
     problem.
     
     Thanks in advance.
     
     Harlan
     [log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2