 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tiKGg-000058C; Fri, 2 Feb 96 06:07 CST |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 02 Feb 96 12:17:24 -0100 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7Bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"pAhD72.0.t07.fvV4n"@ipc> |
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Description: |
<C:\INTERNET\MAIL\EMAIL.TXT> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Feb 3 13: |
55:24 1996 |
| Content-Id: |
<23_51_1_823284345> |
| X-Mailer: |
Ultimedia Mail/2 Lite, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center |
| Message-Id: |
<9602022108.AA0024@localhost> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Our company produces avionica and other high-tech eletronic equipment.
At our new SMA facility we now use solder pastes with show flux-residue
after reflowing. At this moment, cleaning of the SMT P.C.B.'s is done
with a special cleaning product in a Systronic machine.
For several reasons, our cleaning process will probably be changed, then
using demi-water mixed with Isopropyl Alchohol for removal of flux.
This means that I have to test and select other solderpaste for (automated)
stencilprinting and manual dispensing. "No-clean" flux is not really an
option, except for non-visible residues. (We now use Multicore, ESP and
Alpha Metals for a wide variety of products, in general Sn62 RMA.)
My questions are :
1) can anybody give me an advise on which type of solderpaste
I should consider testing.
2) is cleaning with water or IPA (or mixed) a good option for SMT related
products and who has experience with it ?
I hope your answers can help me in selecting the right solder-paste(s).
Ivo de Rooij
Process Engineer/Operator Surface Mount Assembly
Fokker ELMO B.V.
P.O. Box 75
4630 AB Hoogerheide
The Netherlands
(+31)(0) 164 617000
|
|
|
