 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0ti6zB-0000xzC; Thu, 1 Feb 96 15:56 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!fgf1s1.merix.com!David=Boggs%Eng%ECB> |
| Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 96 10:36:07 PST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Feb 3 13: |
35:26 1996 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"O491v.0.M78.tRJ4n"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
What was the problem with flex and Entek OSP? We process a number of
flex products through our Entek line with excellent results, both by
our PCB shop and the assembler. Was the problem related to chemistry
or equipment, namely thin material transport?
Dave Boggs
Merix Corporation
(503) 359-9300 X 4456
[log in to unmask] Wrote:
|
|
| I worked for a flex manufacture that was trying to get
| Entek approved. It's
| almost imposible with flex. I don't recommend it. Be
| sure your spec. is
| clear about ridgid only.
|
|
|
|
