 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0ui7MR-0000GUC; Sun, 21 Jul 96 17:52 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Sun, 21 Jul 1996 16:38:52 +0800 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"alB643.0.Ix6.gIhyn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Jul 22 08: |
45:33 1996 |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I work for a PCBA subcon in the Philippines, and we are currently developing a project that would require using a very thin PCB. I would like to know the limitations of the HAL process, what minimum PCB thickness (FR4) can it handle? Is there any low-cost alternative process (other than bare copper) for surface treatment of such boards? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--
Luke Mendoza
Electronic Assemblies, Inc.
http://www.globe.com.ph/~eai
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
