 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0thpWB-00002oC; Wed, 31 Jan 96 21:17 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:20:48 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Feb 1 09: |
32:30 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"KHByT.0.-38.k234n"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It's more common than you think. Do worry. In fact I'm suprised that your
opperator said anything.
Wait till you find out that the specification you wrote has been converted to
the "Glug" method for chemical adds!
Good luck, your lucky, the rest of us never had a "net" to ask questions.
|
|
|
