 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0thorq-0000DjC; Wed, 31 Jan 96 20:35 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 1996 21:39:29 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Feb 1 09: |
32:16 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"44stu3.0.Mg7.fR24n"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Edwin,
Maybe I'm missing something (please let me know if I am), but many of the old
two step solder strippers could only remove the tin lead in the first step w/
a nitric based stripper, and you had to use a ferric based chemistry to
remove the intermatalic. Are you not familiar with 2 step strippers, or am I
just not understanding the question?
Thanks,
Scott.
|
|
|
