TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0ueBc0-0000D7C; Wed, 10 Jul 96 21:36 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
10 Jul 96 22:42:08 EDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5074
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"B2yPI.0.MAG.VY6vn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Hans M. Rohr" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Thu Jul 11 13:
19:39 1996
X-Loop:
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Does anyone have information or data on what chemical control limits are
required (specific gravity, pH, temperature, etc.) to maintain a constant etcher
conveyer speed for a given copper plating thickness such as 1 oz base and 1 mil
electroplated Cu?  We have done a lot of testing and tried a lot of control
schemes.  Nothing seems to work reliably.  We still etch one piece,  measure the
line width, adjust the conveyor speed accordingly and then run the lot.

Hans Rohr.  

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2