TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0udRbd-0000DAC; Mon, 8 Jul 96 20:28 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 08 Jul 96 18:39:09 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/5018
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jul 9 08:
40:36 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"k-4ib3.0.e9B.FNRun"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"sbryan" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
     70 (or 72) & 50% are usually the standards for film etc.  
     But you being in assembly I would ask your solder past supplier.  I 
     have heard that they are environmentally sensitive!


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Temp. and RH
Author:  [log in to unmask] at corp
Date:    7/3/96 8:09 AM


Our PWB assembly facility is in a controlled environment kept at 72 
degrees F, and 50% R.H.  The problem is, we don't remember how we 
decided these were the best conditions.  Does anyone know of an IPC 
document or other source stating the best environmental conditions for 
PWB assembly (including SM assembly)?
Any info. is appreciated.  Thank you.
     

The mail list is provided by IPC using SmartList v3.05
To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:
[log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2