TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0thgYQ-000058C; Wed, 31 Jan 96 11:42 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 31 Jan 96 12:49: 3 est
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2449
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Tgb_Q3.0.U-8.Kew3n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Bob Smith - Foxboro Co)
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jan 31 11:
46:40 1996
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
SelectMAIL 1.2
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
--- Begin Included Message ---


Simple Question: 

Has anybody found a functional defect in multilayer pwb's due to 
nailheading???

D.Rooke
([log in to unmask])


--- End Included Message ---

Answer - Yes, both after HAL in PWB form and after soldering (wave and IR 
reflow) in PWA form. Nailheading was significant in all cases but it could 
not be determined if failure was caused by thermal stress alone or if 
outgassing contributed.

BOB SMITH 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2