TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 03 Jul 1996 09:22:26 -0600
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4969
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0ubSgT-0000D5C; Wed, 3 Jul 96 09:13 CDT
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Un04F3.0.OmB.G0esn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Kevin M. McCoy" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jul 3 09:
38:49 1996
X-Mailer:
Mozilla 2.01 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
Organization:
Rockwell Automation - Allen Bradley
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
Our PWB assembly facility is in a controlled environment kept at 72 
degrees F, and 50% R.H.  The problem is, we don't remember how we 
decided these were the best conditions.  Does anyone know of an IPC 
document or other source stating the best environmental conditions for 
PWB assembly (including SM assembly)?
Any info. is appreciated.  Thank you.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2