TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0ubNmG-00008hC; Wed, 3 Jul 96 03:59 CDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:14:44 +-800
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4963
TO:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jul 3 09:
37:43 1996
X-Status:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ZXIGt.0.pnE.ZPZsn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Microsoft Windows <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
From: 	Scott B. Westheimer[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 	Thursday, July 3, 1996 5:07 PM
To: 	[log in to unmask]
Subject: 	IPC Specification

To: IPC
From: Scott B. Westheimer
Subject: TM-650
Date: July 3,1996

Regarding the IPC-TM-650 test procedure for No-Flow prepreg (#2.3.17.2), I have a question. In the text, it states to punch two 25.4mm (1in) diameter holes approximately in the middle of the specimen, and refers to figure #1. In figure #1 it shows two 15.9mm (0.625 in) diameter holes. Can you please clarify?

Thank You



ATOM RSS1 RSS2