Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uar8d-0000D9C; Mon, 1 Jul 96 17:08 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Jul 96 16:39:22 CST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"vGfLn1.0.TdI.An4sn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jul 3 09: |
26:41 1996 |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Subject: RE moisture Sensitivity
Author: [log in to unmask] at OUT
Date: 7/1/96
Olly,
I would like to read this paper, could you give me a little
information on ECTC proceedings.
What organization is it?
Where can I get information on it?
How can I find this paper?
I am new to this business.
Thanks in advance
Amy Skubinna
Mfg. Engineer
Manufacturers' Services Ltd
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Moisture Sensitivity
Author: [log in to unmask] at OUT
Date: 6/28/96 3:38 AM
Dirk, have a look at the 1995 ECTC proceedings, for an excellent paper by R.
Shook and others. From memory, a portion of this paper looked at the moisture
absorbtion/desorbtion from components that were moved from ambient
conditions to a dry box, a number of times. If you are trying to set up a
factory policy, I think this will be of use.
Regards
Olly
|
|
|