TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uZFhx-0000CXC; Thu, 27 Jun 96 06:58 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 27 Jun 96 07:59:14 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4891
From [log in to unmask] Thu Jun 27 08:
59:03 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"HzUrY.0.Bd6.8Tdqn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Cc:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
     
     pro's for odd layer builds are few (to my knowledge),ie;
     ability to add additional functions without the normal cost adders 
     associated with 4 layer, 6 layer etc.
     
     potential for maintaining somewhat thinner profile over extra layers
     
     con's outweight the above (again in my opinion);
     built in warp and twist factor (added) due to weave of fibre 
     pulling/pushing against each other (odd layers tend to over power)
     
     fall out rate due to excessive warp/twist possibility is greater (cost)
     
     normal process of building the "book" for processing is different (operator
awareness)

      




     

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: FAB : Odd Layer PCB's
Author:  [log in to unmask] at SMTPLINK-HADCO
Date:    6/27/96 2:09 AM


Dear TechNet,
     
Can anyone give me pro's and con's for designing Odd number of Layer 
PCB's i.e. 3 and 5 layer boards
     
Stephen Cooper
Manufacturing Projects Manager
     
SCITEC LIMITED
Apollo Place
Lane Cove NSW 2066
Australia
     
Phone   : +612 428 9500
Fax     : +612 428 9589
Email   : [log in to unmask] 
Website : http://www.scitec.com.au
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2