 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0th2X7-0000U4C; Mon, 29 Jan 96 16:58 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 96 12:01:40 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"9vF2o3.0.AAA.V4L3n"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jan 31 11: |
33:31 1996 |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
_______________________ Subject: Footprint Pattern
Larry,
I saw your message (below)...did you get your answer??
What system are you using ? Does it not support alternate part usage?
Does it support manufacturing clean-up?
Rodney J. Parrish
Apps Engineer
______________________________________________________________________
Author: [log in to unmask] at internet_link Date: 1/17/96 7:40 AM
I'm a pcb designer. I have a customer that needs the option of using
either a .3 wide or .4 wide 32 pin j-leaded part in the same location.
These are only prototype boards and small quantity. Probably won't be
reflowed.
Question:
In order to accomodate both parts the footprint is going to be extra
long. What problems will be encountered soldering the part to the
board? Will the solder wickup onto the j-lead properly?
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
