 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uYvGV-0000FGC; Wed, 26 Jun 96 09:08 CDT |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 26 13: |
38:01 1996 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 96 07:12:10 PDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Cc: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"cx3t02.0.Yb8.HHKqn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
HOWZITGOIN?
Gary Willard wrote:
...are there any major concerns or advantages in having the vias
connecting directly into the plane without relief...
At Rockwell, flooded (no thermal relief) vias have been standard
operating procedure for the last 5 years. We just photo plot a
round circle that is smaller than the hole size (ie: .004") for
each plane connection. It's small enough to get drilled away
but large enough so the fab house doesn't think we forgot about
those holes.
Thank you and have a FANTASTIC day!
Kevin L. Seaman (714) 221-4752
P.S. If your "reply" bounces back, then "send" to:
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
