TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uYcuW-0000CdC; Tue, 25 Jun 96 13:32 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 25 Jun 1996 14:36:47 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4840
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"R8XEC.0.rIB.n23qn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Steve Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
Novell GroupWise 4.1
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 25 14:
03:09 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
Is there an IPC spec, or otherwise, that provides some guideline on the
current capacity of vias on PCBs, based on hole size, wall thickness,
etc?  Any thoughts are appreciated.

Steve Murphy
TRW Automotive 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2