 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uWOMC-0000DtC; Wed, 19 Jun 96 09:35 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 1996 10:42:58 +0400 (EDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 21 08: |
38:35 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ZVcgV2.0.YVA._01on"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Last month there were some brief discussions of resist adhesion. Using
ASTM D3359-87(a cross-hatch test) was suggested.
My questions are:
1) is anyone using such a test for testing acceptance of laminated
photoresist?
2) is anyone using such a test for process control in lamination or
exposure or developing of photoresist?
3) what defects can appear if adhesion is too low?
4) what defects can appear if adhesion is too high?
I would like to discuss these with any interested parties.
Lou Hart
412-858-6117
compunetics
.
|
|
|
