TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uWEpk-0000C9C; Tue, 18 Jun 96 23:25 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 19 Jun 1996 00:32:55 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 19 08:
27:30 1996
Message-ID:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4739
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"9cdiy2.0.rRF._4unn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Neal - 

Which OSP?  They aren't all the same.  They are lots of "imidazoles", yes,
but the similarity ends there.  If they are considered to be "commodities" by
the industry, I'd be interested to know that too.

Regards,

Roger Mouton



ATOM RSS1 RSS2