 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uW6v0-0000E5C; Tue, 18 Jun 96 14:58 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 18 Jun 1996 16:06:17 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 18 18: |
16:20 1996 |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"IDC0v.0.koH.bfmnn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am starting to see a multitude of automatic exposure units in my travels.
While they were always an excellent concept, they never caught on because of
a number of issues. Apparently, most of the past issues have been addressed
and the units are being installed at an increasing rate. If your company
fits the profile for the use of an automatic unit, I believe that
investigating them would be time well spent.
Ken Bridges - Dynachem
|
|
|
