TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uTuIG-0000EmC; Wed, 12 Jun 96 13:05 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 12 Jun 96 10:19:53 EST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 14 17:
47:01 1996
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4650
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"oxetb3.0.eHI.aRmln"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Hollandsworth, Ron" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
     What would be a reliable test method for selling the 
     No-Clean/Low-Residue flux concept to Mil Customers.  Is 
     Ionograph testing best?  Could I get some replys from some 
     of you folks who have jumped this hurdle.  Looking for some 
     suggestions.  Thanks in advance for the help.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2