 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uTX1P-0000CiC; Tue, 11 Jun 96 12:14 CDT |
| Encoding: |
16 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 11 Jun 96 12:20:00 CDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 11 18: |
15:35 1996 |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"FEIzW.0.CCH.obQln"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello to all!
I need some inputs to answer the following questions:
* Can anyone tell me the minimum thickness requirement for Push-in Push-out?
* How reliable is this method in terms of printing, SMT placement and
reflow?
* What kind of restrictions applies to this type of depanel method?
(minimum edge clearance, tooling hole ...etc.)
Any responses will be highly appreciated.
Mike Yuen
|
|
|
