TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Thu, 6 Jun 96 16:11:27 MDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4599
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 7 10:
24:29 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Q0DSI2.0.AnE.pWrjn"@ipc>
Subject:
X-Priority:
3 (Normal)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uRnJk-0000CjC; Thu, 6 Jun 96 17:14 CDT
From:
"BILL RUGG" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)

HEY DOC!

For better component placement, the PCB design group moved the mechanical 
screw mounting holes that control the Z-forces from the compression 
connector to the edge of the board.  Now, the assembled board bows across 
the mounting area, leading people to believe that there could be a 
component solder stress problem. 

The only specification found for assembled boards was the Bow and Twist 
ANSI/J-STD-001 9.2.3 of 0.75% for SMT Boards. Does anyone know of a solder 
joint or an assembled component stress guideline, other than the J-STD-001 
Bow and Twist Specification?

See ya.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2