Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:57:46 -0500 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jun 7 10: |
22:42 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"4ryKM1.0.iBC._aojn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uRkBs-0000D7C; Thu, 6 Jun 96 13:53 CDT |
X-Sender: |
|
Message-Id: |
<v01540b00addcda5aa203@[204.180.62.40]> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>From the EMPF HelpLine in Indianpolis, prepared by Pat Kane.
> SMT magazine for a back issue that has a chart showing
>comparisons of equipment between vendors. Don't know which issue but about
>one year ago.
>Secondly, the more important thing is to define his needs i.e. thru-put,
>type of components, captive or contract builds, etc. The thing to remember
>here is that these machines ALL place components and do it well or they
>would not be in the business. The evaluation becomes what are YOU going to
>do with it in your facility? If you are changing the mix of parts out a
>lot, then you should investigate machines that are easiest to changeover.
>If you are building the same thing eveyday, then thru-put may be the most
>important parameter. The ease of programming becomes a major difference
>between machines especially if you are a contract builder and change over
>a lot.
>He can call me if he likes and we can discuss this further when I know more
>about what his application will be.
Jack Crawford
HelpLine Manager
Electronics Mfg. Productivity Facility
317.226.5616
Visit our homepage at:
http://www.empf.org
|
|
|