TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tfshE-0000PSC; Fri, 26 Jan 96 12:16 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 26 Jan 96 10:22:51 PST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2391
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"7BFU83.0.yiF.tfH2n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"dmitchel" <[log in to unmask]>
From [log in to unmask] Wed Jan 31 11:
05:35 1996
Resent-From:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
 Eric, 
 
 1. Work with you PCB supplier and OEM to modify break-away design for 
 easier breaking. 
 
 2. How about score-to-break for the fab design? 
 
 3. Depaneling equipment: Radoll Designs; California rep is Joe Moran 
 @714.625.1113. Check your Nepcon directory for others.
 
 good luck
 [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: depanelization
Author:  [log in to unmask] at corp
Date:    1/25/96 4:05 PM


     We are having a problem with our depanelization methods. These are 3 
     up panels, 6 x 14 ea.., with tabs on the outside and in between each 
     board. The problem is stress on the boards when trying to remove ea. 
     board from the panel. We are bending each board to break of the tabs 
     on the inside. We are using mouse bites on the tab connections.
 
     If you can understand my muffled description, any help would be 
     appreciated.  Thankz in advanced - Eric Bernal Process Eng... 
     Pragmatech
     Sunnyvale, CA. (408)734-0595
 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2