TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uRf6R-00008hC; Thu, 6 Jun 96 08:27 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 5 Jun 96 16:16:50 EDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/4560
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Thu Jun 6 09:
56:16 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ZOeNN1.0.DdA.Qpjjn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
X-Mailer:
E-Mail 1.7
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Can any one educate me on Porosity requirements for gold fingers?

BELLCORE TR-NWT-000078 14.2.2.2 Table 22 calls out ranges of 
acceptable Pore counts for given gold thicknesses. My question is 
what is the purpose of pore requirements? Is the implication that if 
the gold is to porous it is more susceptible to wear out and/or 
corrosion? Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you

Joe Pudlo



ATOM RSS1 RSS2