 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 05 Jun 1996 11:01:55 -0700 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uRMnN-0000CBC; Wed, 5 Jun 96 12:55 CDT |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"zbV3p.0.AfF.pdSjn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Jun 5 17: |
28:19 1996 |
| X-Mailer: |
Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; U) |
| Organization: |
TRW San Diego |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would like comments from other MPM SPM-AV users about how relevant stencil and squeegee height
re-check is when using an existing file. MPM has indicated that these checks should be made
every time but I would like to know what other users actually do in production.
Thank you,
Judy Murray
TRW San Diego
619.592.3616
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
